9 thoughts on “

  1. Hey there!
    I think this video is very nice, because of the clear pronunceation, informative script and interesting subject. You bring multiple views of the problem and add context to the situation.
    But I didn´t hear what Bruno said in the end, and at the beginning because of the loud news intro music. Maybe lower the volume of the music or amp up the volume on the microphone next time

    Very good job!
    //Carlos

  2. This video was interesting! You have many points that are scientifically proven and intriguing. For example when you said that the fish can’t be sold because of the plastic in its body. You also came with good tips that everyone can accomplish. What you said about role models was really good because that makes people more dedicated. The background wall was maybe a bit boring but the quality of the content made it up. So the video was excellent.

    //Julia

  3. Hi!

    First, I just want to say that it was a very good video. You speak clearly but sometimes the background sound speaks over you. It’s not a big problem, I still hear you accept from the ending when Bruno speaks. You bring up good information about the plastic in the ocean and how it is a problem and it is easy to understand. You said what we could do and why it is so much plastic in the ocean, you had all the information that was important and even a bit more, good! I think you did a great job whit the video, I think it as a very good idea to put in birds in the background when you were in “Cosa Rica” it felt more realistic. Nice work!

  4. The video script is nice written and it’s easy to follow with in the video. The solution of the problem you took up in the video its good presented. The seagull sound effect is hilarious, to think about next time is have a more stabilised camera angle.

  5. The difference in volume between the intro and when Bruno starts to talk is astronomical. But the pronunciation is veary good. The camerawork during the interview is quite shaky which ruins the immersion. You can tell that during some parts they read directly from the manuscript when they loo and some parts have some bad pronunciations. The music at the end is also really loud and it starts to early which cuts Bruno of and makes it impossible to hear what he is saying at the end. The problem is presented and tackled really well.

  6. Good job! The video is very informative and easy to understand. I like how you describe the problem from different perspectives and bring up many consequences that will occur if we keep going like this. The solution is concrete and describes that it is every person’s responsibility to take care of the nature, but also that we need to work together as a country etc. Interesting interview, but maybe you could articulate a little more, but that’s it! Great job!

  7. Nice video;) I liked that you changed scenes, it kept my interest up. The facts in your movie made me reflect over my own behaviour concerning plastic bags and so on, it was an real eye opening. How “Miguel” and Linnea expresses the causes from plastic pollution in the oceans gave me a totally new perspective. Really good work with your intuitive explanations of the issue and its causes. However even though your video was presented in a good way with tons of similarities I would have appreciated more examples on what you as an individual could do to improve the situation. I think you spoke more about what countries are in need to do rather than uncomplicated actions you could do yourself everyday to help out the people in Costa rica for instance.

  8. Very well performed!

    I thought the film was very interesting because you interviewed one inhabitant that explained the problem for the viewers. I thought it was good to explain that the fish contains plastic and that when people eat the fish they will get the plastic in their own stomach. So due to this the fishermen are not allowed to sell the fish which of course is bad for the business.

    You picked up the problem very clearly and you explained how the problem can be solved by not throwing garbage in the nature.

    One thing that you could do better is to look a little more interested in the subject. I also found the background noise (the seagulls) a bit disturbing.

  9. Very well performed!

    I thought the film was very interesting because you interviewed one inhabitant that explained the problem for the viewers. I thought it was good to explain that the fish contains plastic and that when people eat the fish they will get the plastic in their own stomach. So due to this the fishermen are not allowed to sell the fish which of course is bad for the business.

    You picked up the problem very clearly and you said how the problem can be solved by not throwing garbage in the nature.

    One thing that you could do better is to look a little more interested in the subject. I also found the background noise (the seagulls) a bit disturbing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *